Not a member? Sign Up

Reasons for Joining

    Address your challenges through knowledge sharing with peers from our global network of specialists.

    Benchmark your business initiatives with the who's who in the field.

    Hear from industry pioneers how to maximize ROI in today's challenging economy.

    And best of all It's FREE!
Sign in using your existing
Pharma IQ account
Username or Email:

Sign Up  |  Already a member? Sign In  |  Visit IQPC.com  
Pharma IQ

Key Considerations from Genzyme for the Technology Transfer of Lyophilisation Cycles for Parenteral Drug Products

Contributor:  Timothy McCoy
Posted:  01/17/2013  12:00:00 AM EST  | 
0

Rate this Interview: (4.0 Stars | 1 Vote)

Tim McCoy, Principal Scientist at Genzyme provides insight into the work Genzyme is doing on technology transfer of lyophilisation cycles for parent drug products, as well as discussing the influence of nucleation in the scale up process. Tim will also be speaking at the 3rd Annual Lyophilisation for Biologicals Conference in Munich between the 19th and 21st of February.

Pharma IQ: Your presentation is on Key Considerations for the Technology Transfer of Lyophilisation Cycles for Parenteral Drug Products, can you give us a brief overview of the top considerations?

T. McCoy:
Considerations include developing a valid gap analysis and identifying scientific studies to bridge gaps. Its is also when you can look for opportunities for process improvements. Process understanding is key e.g. measuring Kv (vial heat transfer coefficient) and understanding pressure control as a function of sublimation conditions.

A good product understanding must be achieved if not already available as part of the initial technical transfer package. Also, keep in mind that the manufacturing process may be completely different in the receiving unit, so the behaviour of the product may be different from a stability perspective. Studies must be performed to understand the impact of new stresses on the product.

Lastly, no two freeze dryers are the same and the lyophilisation cycle performance must be understood well and fitted to the target freeze dryer upon transfer.

Pharma IQ: What challenges are you currently facing in this area?

T. McCoy:
The main challenge is to generate the data around heat and mass transfer dynamics on manufacturing freeze dryers as this project will be in direct competition with product manufacturing scheduling. Working with manufacturing and scheduling is a priority to achieve the end goals.



Pharma IQ: What are your main priorities for 2013?

T. McCoy
: The technical transfer of biological products to our site, such as building current product and process understanding by performing studies such as vial heat transfer modelling.

Pharma IQ: Can you tell us about the influence of nucleation in the scale up process – are there ways to overcome this problem?

T. McCoy:
Unless we control ice nucleation it is very difficult to claim that we apply Quality by Design (QbD) to lyophilisation cycle development and scale up. The freeze drying cycle designed in the laboratory is not representative of how it would perform in manufacturing due to (1) differences in the degree of supercooling between the laboratory and manufacturing and a (2) heat transfer differences between the freeze dryers as a direct result of freeze dryer design differences. The impact of design differences between freeze dryers on heat transfer dynamics is well understood and modelled.

Ice nucleation is a function of the particulate levels within the formulation. The lower the particulate levels, the lower the ice nucleation temperature, which results in a higher degree of supercooling and larger ice crystals. Annealing may be added to the freezing step in an attempt to achieve homogeneous ice nucleation, which has been demonstrated to be successful to a certain extent. However, to effectively control ice nucleation, techniques such ice fog and depressurization should be employed, where the  degree of supercooling can be controlled and maintained at a lower level,  making ice nucleation independent to particulate levels (or thermocouples for that matter).

It is well understood that the degree of supercooling directly influences primary drying performance. Homogeneous ice nucleation results in consistent cake morphology from vial to vial within the freeze dryer along with a more scalable freezing step, all as a result of maintaining the degree of supercooling irrespective of the manufacturing environment. Implementing ice nucleation control will simplify scale up and make the development work performed in the laboratory more relevant to the manufacturing process. Lastly, it will minimize vial to vial cake heterogeneity within and between batches at manufacturing scale.
 

Have Your Say
Rate this feature and give us your feedback in the comments section below


Timothy McCoy Contributor:   Timothy McCoy


* = required.

Not a member yet? Sign up
User Name:
Password:

Be the first to leave a comment
Sign in or Sign up to post a comment

Advertisement

Events of Interest
Download Brochure

Please complete the information below to complete your download.

Please note: That all fields marked with an asterisk (*) are required.

First Name *
Last Name *
Job Title *
Company Name *
Email Address *
Telephone *
Country *
Where did you hear about us? *

I would like to receive information about sponsorship and exhibition opportunities

Yes, sign me up for the FREE Pharma IQ e-newsletter, including information on FREE Podcasts, Webinars, event discounts and online learning opportunities.

Advertisement